Considering player profiles

I'm thinking they need a different profile, like an experienced player who can link play or a versatile wide forward. They might also consider investing in positions like center-back, defensive midfielder, or right-back. There are various market alternatives such as Zirkzee, Toney, Guirassy, and Osimhen, each with different price points and fit with Ten Hag's style. It’s crucial to clarify that these considerations aren't just hindsight, and I should ask the user how they'd like to proceed—perhaps polish this into a structured post?Crafting a concise response
The instruction suggests I should ask for clarification only when necessary. I plan to create a compact list of reasons such as Fit, Opportunity Cost, Risk, Squad Planning, and Alternatives. I’ll also include a brief opener in Chinese that emphasizes these factors were verifiable before the matches or transfers occurred. Additionally, I’ll make sure to keep the tone neutral yet supportive and avoid citing specific stats since they can't be verified. Let’s get this short version ready for online sharing.
给你一版可提前说清“不是马后炮”的理由框架,都是转会决策前就能预见、可验证的点。你可以直接摘用发帖/回复。

一句话版(可贴):不是马后炮,谢什科的问题在于“角色重叠+战术匹配不即时+PSR下机会成本过高”。曼联更需要的是补短板的类型(6号、右路威胁、经验型链接9号),而不是再押一位和霍伊伦发展轨迹相近的潜力中锋。
需要的话,我可以按你常用平台(长贴/短评/推文)改成相应长度的版本,或补充几位现实可行的替代目标对比要点。